You cannot select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

61 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown

# API design decisions
Generated API is modified from what `openapi-generator` does by default.
Changes are mostly focused on better user experience - including better
usage patterns and simpler/faster ways to achieve results.
## Changes
- Added type annotations for return types and class members
This change required us to implement a custom post-processing script,
which converts generated types into correct type annotations. The types
generated by default are supposed to work with the API implementation
(parameter validation and parsing), but they are not applicable as
type annotations (they have incorrect syntax). Custom post-processing
allowed us to make these types correct type annotations.
Other possible solutions:
- There is a `python-experimental` API generator, which may solve
some issues, but it is unstable and requires python 3.9. Our API
works with 3.7, which is the lowest supported version now.
- Custom templates - partially works, but only in limited cases
(model fields). It's very hard to maintain the template code and
logic for this. Only `if` checks and `for` loops are available in
mustache templates, which is not enough for annotation generation.
- Separate APIs are embedded into the general `APIClient` class
Now we have:
```python
with ApiClient(config) as api_client:
result1 = api_client.foo_api.operation1()
result2 = api_client.bar_api.operation2()
```
This showed to be more convenient than default:
```python
with ApiClient(config) as api_client:
foo_api = FooApi(api_client)
result1 = foo_api.operation1()
result2 = foo_api.operation2()
bar_api = BarApi(api_client)
result3 = bar_api.operation3()
result4 = bar_api.operation4()
```
This also required custom post-processing. Operation Ids are
[supposed to be unique](https://swagger.io/specification/#operation-object)
in the OpenAPI / Swagger specification. Therefore, we can't generate such
schema on the server, nor we can't expect it to be supported in the
API generator.
- Operations have IDs like `<api>/<method>_<object>`
This also showed to be more readable and more natural than DRF-spectacular's
default `<api>/<object>_<method>`.
- Server operations have different types for input and output values
While it can be expected that an endopint with POST/PUT methods available
(like `create` or `partial_update`) has the same type for input and output
(because it looks natural), it also leads to the situation, in which there
are lots of read-/write-only fields, and it becomes hard for understanding.
This clear type separation is supposed to make it simpler for users.